@⇒ Two premise arguments ⇒ Logical Reasoning Multiple Choice Questions / Objective type questions, MCQ's, with question and answers, download free PDF, short cut notes, rapid fire notes, best theory

Home⇒ Reasoning⇒ Logical⇒ Two premise arguments

Note:- You can add tough questions into your favourite list for second revision.


Q1.	Statements : All huts are mansions. All mansions are temples. Conclusions : I. Some temples are huts. II. Some temples are mansions.
A.	Only conclusion I follows [Wrong Answer]
B.	Only conclusion II follows [Wrong Answer]
C.	Either conclusion I or II follows [Wrong Answer]
D.	Neither conclusion I nor II follows [Wrong Answer]
E.	Both conclusions I and II follow [Correct Answer]
View Answer 5 -2 Explanation:- Answer : E Discuss it below : As discussed above, it follows that All huts are temples. I is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds. II is the converse of the second premise and so it also holds. Click here for more comments


Q2.	Statements : All water is divine. All temples are divine. Conclusions : I. All water is temple. II. All temples are water.
A.	Only conclusion I follows [Wrong Answer]
B.	Only conclusion II follows [Wrong Answer]
C.	Either conclusion I or II follows [Wrong Answer]
D.	Neither conclusion I nor II follows [Correct Answer]
E.	Both conclusions I and II follow [Wrong Answer]
View Answer 4 -4 Explanation:- Answer : D Discuss it below : Since the middle term 'divine' is not distribUted even once in the premises, no de\finite conclusion can be drawn. Click here for more comments


Q3.	Statements : All cars are cats. All fans are cats. Conclusions : I. All cars are fans. II. Some fans are cars.
A.	Only conclusion I follows [Wrong Answer]
B.	Only conclusion II follows [Wrong Answer]
C.	Either conclusion I or II follows [Wrong Answer]
D.	Neither conclusion I nor II follows [Correct Answer]
E.	Both conclusions I and II follow [Wrong Answer]
View Answer 1 -2 Explanation:- Answer : D Discuss it below : Since the middle term 'cats' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. Click here for more comments


Q4.	Statements : All pens are chalks. All chairs are chalks. Conclusions : I.Some pens are chairs. II.Some chalks are pens.
A.	Only conclusion I follows [Wrong Answer]
B.	Only conclusion II follows [Correct Answer]
C.	Either conclusion I or II follows [Wrong Answer]
D.	Neither conclusion I nor II follows [Wrong Answer]
E.	Both conclusions I and II follow [Wrong Answer]
View Answer 1 -1 Explanation:- Answer : B Discuss it below : Since the middle term 'chalks' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion \follows. However, II is the converse of the first premise and so it holds. Click here for more comments


Q5.	Statements : All good athletes win. All good athletes eat well. Conclusions : I. All those who eat well are good athletes. II. All those who win eat well.
A.	Only conclusion I follows [Wrong Answer]
B.	Only conclusion II follows [Wrong Answer]
C.	Either conclusion I or II follows [Wrong Answer]
D.	Neither conclusion I nor II follows [Correct Answer]
E.	Both conclusions I and II follow [Wrong Answer]
View Answer 2 -1 Explanation:- Answer : D Discuss it below : Since the middle term 'good athletes' is dis-tributed twice in the premises, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So it follows that 'Some of those who win, eat well'. Click here for more comments

1 2 ..Next.>> Page 1 of 2

Or